Into the unknown: Should we dim the Sun to save the ice?

Into the unknown: Should we dim the Sun to save the ice?

This weekend, Interesting Engineering focuses on a new study exploring Solar Radiation Management (SRM) — perhaps better known as the proposal to dim the sun to save the Earth’s icy regions from melting. 

However, researchers warn of chaotic unintended consequences from hacking Earth's climate system, along with a failure to tackle to root cause of warming — fossil fuel combustion. Solar dimming may not even affect some types of warning at all. 

We have the full story below, plus more highlights from this week’s subscriber-only articles. Let's get into it.

Cartoon

Dimming the sun

Weekly Must Read

As climate change accelerates, melting Earth's ice at an alarming speed, some scientists propose a drastic response — artificially reducing incoming sunlight to cool the planet. 

Solar radiation management involves spraying sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, forming a hazy veil that scatters sunlight back into space, temporarily cooling surface temperatures, and perhaps preserving the remaining ice sheets. 

However, one study indicates that solar dimming cannot reverse subsurface ocean warming that has already eroded ice over recent centuries.

Climate simulations can also help to quantify the likely impact of solar engineering on the Antarctic ice sheet. They forecast that injecting aerosols after 2050 could slow loss, but only alongside aggressive emissions cuts. That's because artificially reducing radiation cannot fully replace the effect of rapid decarbonization. Reducing sunlight would only treat a climate symptom while the underlying fossil fuel cause persists.

"Observations of ice flows in West Antarctica indicate that we are very close to a so-called tipping point or have already passed it," says study lead Johannes Sutter. 

But intentionally altering Earth's energy balance carries unknown risks: Shifted weather patterns, ongoing ocean acidification, and disrupted hydrological cycles. 

"Geoengineering would be another uncontrolled global experiment and potentially dangerous meddling in the climate system," notes Sutter. International climate treaties have opposed real-world solar engineering tests due to profound ethical concerns and unpredictable side effects. Blotting out sunlight could reduce regional rainfall or snowfall worldwide, bringing drought and water scarcity to some areas along with floods to others.

Yet as urgency mounts, pressure for a rapid response increaes. Could just a little planetary hacking buy enough time for societies to decarbonize? As Antarctic ice vanishes at alarming speed, once unthinkable schemes suddenly surface as last ditch hopes. Read on to learn more about this controversial climate intervention.

Read More

VIDEO OF THE DAY

Is Nikola Tesla Overrated?

Pigeon-Guided Missiles And Human-Pigeon History

Pigeons have played an astonishing role in human history, from guiding missiles to excelling in search and rescue missions. Today, we present the story of the fascinating and often unexpected interactions between pigeons and humans over the years.

AND ANOTHER THING

Need help with advertising? Reach 150,000 engineering and tech professionals. Contact us 

what else?

⚙️ To explore the wonders of mechanical engineering, get your  Gears in Motion  

🔷 For all the week’s top engineering stories, subscribe to the  Vital Component  

🧑🏻‍🔧 For expert advice on engineering careers, subscribe to   Engineer Pros   

🧠 New: To get the latest AI news every Monday, subscribe to   AI Logs   

🎬 For a weekly round-up of our best science, tech & engineering videos, subscribe to   IE Originals   

© Copyright 2023 | The Blueprint is by Interesting Engineering, Inc. 530 Fifth Ave, 9th floor New York, NY 10036, USA All Rights Reserved

You are receiving this email because you have subscribed to our newsletter. Manage your e-mail preferences here.  Unsubscribe from our emails here.  See our full privacy policy or terms of conditions.